Legal Opinion

Henry Koehler & Co. v. Hines

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 3, 1919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

Tbe appellee, Hines, contracted with one Stroud, doing business as tbe Stroud Contracting Company, to erect a residence upon a lot owned by bim, and Stroud contracted with appellant, a lumber merchant, to furnish for use in constructing same, certain specified lumber, *271contained in an “estimate,” for $342.50, and as the work progressed ordered certain other materials, which, when added to the estimate, made his total indebtedness to appellant $632.04. Whether appellant, under section 2463 Kentucky Statutes, has a materialmen’s lien for this amount…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Hartley v. RichardsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
  3. Wolflin-Luhring Lumber Co. v. MoselyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Lippert v. LasarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vogt v. Cannon Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Akers & Co. v. WeilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Will B. Miller Co. v. LavalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Haynie v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  5. Sandusky Foundary and MacHine Company v. City of WickliffeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API