Legal Opinion
Sandusky Foundary and MacHine Company v. City of Wickliffe
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1973No. 73-1104PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEESE, District Judge.
This action for the enforcement, under Kentucky law, of a claimed material-man’s lien, resulted in a judgment for the appellee Sandusky Foundry and Machine Company (Sandusky) against the appellants City of Wickliffe (City) and Westvaco Corporation (Westvaco) for $130,054 with interest from December 12, 1969. An appeal was taken by the appellants. We affirm.
The simplified facts are that Sandus-ky contracted with Rice Barton Corporation (R-B) to fabricate for $157,659 elements (rollers) of a 3,300-ton pa-permaking machine, costing about $7,-000,000, which R-B had agreed on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawrence E. Kitchen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Henry Koehler & Co. v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Akers & Co. v. WeilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- City of Ashland v. Ben Williamson & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cleo CALAGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Cecil G. Noble v. National Mines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985