Legal Opinion
Akers & Co. v. Weil
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 23, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Reversing.
This is a companion case of Weil v. Buffaloe & Co., 251 Ky. 673, 65 S. W. (2d) 2374, this day decided.
The appellant, Akers & Co., was a subcontractor for the installation of certain partitions in the toilets and for furnishing other materials'for the building. The court refused to award it a lien because timely notice had not been given. If consideration be given to cer tain items of labor and material, the lien was perfected in time. The appellee contends that this work was so trivial and incidental that it should not be taken into…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weil v. B. E. Buffaloe & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- National Surety Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Henry Koehler & Co. v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Standard Homes Corp. v. ReineckeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
- City of Ashland v. Ben Williamson & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Walker v. Valley Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1963
- Sandusky Foundary and MacHine Company v. City of WickliffeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- SANDUSKY FOUNDRY & MACHINE CO. v. City of WickliffeDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1972