Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Corpus Christi Transmission Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 14, 1992No. 13-91-101-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

DORSEY, Justice.

Upon consideration of the motion for rehearing filed in this case, which involves a utility’s right to lay high pressure gas pipelines under a highway right-of-way when the original easement grant was limited to roadway purposes, we overrule the motion, withdraw our original opinion rendered February 6, 1992, and substitute the following opinion.

The Grimeses’ land abuts a state highway built on an easement granted to the State by the Grimeses’ predecessor in title. That easement recites that it is “for the purpose of opening, constructing, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ForisterTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hill Farm, Inc. v. Hill CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Kearney & Son v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Tenngasco Gas Gathering Co. v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Pittman v. City of AmarilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Harlingen Irrigation District Cameron County No. 1 v. Caprock Communications Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  2. Brookshire Katy Drainage District v. Lily Gardens, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Anderson v. Teco Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  4. Marta Arredondo v. Techserv Consulting and Training, Ltd., T&D Solutions, LLC, and AEP Texas Central Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
  5. Gleason v. TaubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API