Legal Opinion

Pittman v. City of Amarillo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 1980No. 9113PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUNTISS, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment denying any recovery to appellants, Floyd Pittman and wife Freda Pittman, hereafter “the Pittmans,” in their suit against appellee, the City of Amarillo, hereafter “Amarillo,” entered pursuant to a directed verdict granted Amarillo by the trial court after the parties closed the evidence. The following two questions are presented: (1) do the Pittmans have a cause of action against Amarillo for damages caused by the plugging and removal of a portion of the Pittman’s private sewer line located under a public street; and (2) are the Pittmans…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clear Lake City Water Authority v. Clear Lake Utilities Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of Mission v. PopplewellTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Hill Farm, Inc. v. Hill CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Gotcher v. City of FarmersvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bowers v. City of TaylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Word of Faith World Outreach Center Church, Inc. v. Oechsner, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  3. McDaniel v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Grimes v. Corpus Christi Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  5. Ferrara v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API