Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Teco Pipeline Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided January 22, 1999No. 04-97-00856-CVPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOM RICKHOFF, Justice.
In this eminent domain proceeding, the trial court granted Teco Pipeline Company an easement for a natural gas pipeline across the property of Jack Z. Anderson and Teresa A. Anderson and awarded the Andersons $13,980 for the taking. The Andersons appeal, arguing that the trial court erred by: 1) rendering an amended judgment during the period of its plenary power; 2) determining that Teco has the power of eminent domain; and 3) concluding that the pipeline is necessary for a public purpose. We affirm.
Factual and PROCEDURAL Background
Teco desired to build a natural gas…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mapco, Inc. v. ForrestTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Coastal States Gas Producing Company v. PateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- City of West Lake Hills v. State Ex. Rel. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Coastal Industrial Water Authority v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Maher v. LasaterTexas Supreme Court · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Quanaim v. Frasco Restaurant & Catering, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Ahmed v. Shimi Ventures, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- Whittington v. City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Malcomson Road Utility District v. Newsom, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Mercier v. MidTexas Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.