Legal Opinion

White v. Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1904No. 4,642PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From Wayne Circuit Court, R. O. Fox, Judge. Action by the Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie Railroad and another against Louisa II. White for the condemnation of land. From a judgment in favor of defendant for less than she claimed, she appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This was a proceeding by appellee for the appropriation of a right of way over and across certain der scribed real estate. Upon the real estate, situated between the high banks of the Whitewater river, is located a paper-mill, consisting of several brick buildings, containing engines, boilers, and various kinds of machinery used in the manufacture of paper. The railroad crosses the liver on an iron bridge extending from the top of the bank on one side to the top of the bank on the other, and supported by piers in the bed of the stream, some of which piers are on appellant’s land. The bridge…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Voorhis v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Mills v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Ottumwa Woolen Mill Co. v. HawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Taylor v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Costell v. Toledo HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  5. Southern California Telephone Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API