Legal Opinion

Costell v. Toledo Hospital

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1988No. Nos. 87-532 and 87-442PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The findings of the courts below were that Civ. R. 41(A)(1) was a voluntary dismissal upon the merits and also that the prima facie tort is not a recognized cause of action within Ohio’s courts. We now reverse in part and affirm in part.

I

It has been consistently admitted by the parties that the central issue under Civ. R. 41(A)(1) is whether a voluntary and unilateral dismissal by the plaintiffs is a failure by plaintiffs “otherwise than upon the merits” for purposes of the application of R.C. 2305.19. We need only refer to our recent holding in Frysinger v. Leech (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 38,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. White v. Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Bajpayee v. RothermichOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Reminger & Reminger Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Sharon Palkow v. Csx Transportation, Inc., Harry Crawford and Diane TavaresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. United Magazine Co. v. Murdoch Magazines Distribution, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Climaco, Seminatore, Delligatti & Hollenbaugh v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Hershey v. EdelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API