Ottumwa Woolen Mill Co. v. Hawley
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wapello Owouit Gourt. In 1870, one Grim was the owner of part of an ont lot in the city of Ottumwa, upon which was situated a woolen manufactory propelled by a steam engine, and which manufactory contained all the usual machinery and appliances for manufacturing cloth from wool. On the 1st day of October, 1870, said Grim executed a trust deed on said real estate to secure a loan of $4,000 from the Lamar Insurance Company.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Wapello Owouit Gourt. In 1870, one Grim was the owner of part of an ont lot in the city of Ottumwa, upon which was situated a woolen manufactory propelled by a steam engine, and which manufactory contained all the usual machinery and appliances for manufacturing cloth from wool. On the 1st day of October, 1870, said Grim executed a trust deed on said real estate to secure a loan of $4,000 from the Lamar Insurance Company. The said trust deed, after the description of the land by metes and bounds in the granting clause thereof, grants “ all and singular the tenements, hereditaments…
1Opinion of the CourtRothrook, J.
l. convextenan0©3Ppui' I. At the time of the trial in the court below an examination of the premises and machinery in question was made by the court, and the parties, and an agreement was made as to the situation and manner of attachment of the various parts of the machinery, after which no evidence was taken as to the character of the *59attachment of the machinery in question. This agreement is quite lengthy, and it is not necessary to incorporate it in this opinion in order to properly comprehend the conclusion to which we have arrived.
The court found that the following property was affixed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Voorhis v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
- Potter v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Murdock v. . GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Gale v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
3Cited by57 opinions
- Mills v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Commercial Finance Co. v. Brooksville Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Cary Hardware Co. v. McCartyColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
- Frost v. SchinkelNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Taylor v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.