Legal Opinion

David Stott Flour Mills v. Saginaw County Farm Bureau

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1927No. Docket No. 73PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in manufacturing and dealing in flour, with headquarters at Detroit. The defendant corporation was organized on November 15, 1920, under Act No. 171, Pub. Acts 1903 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 9054 et seq.). Its objects, as stated in its articles, are to>—

“correlate and promote efforts of the local association of farmers * * * educationally, legislatively and economically, by doing primarily and principally for the members, and not for pecuniary profit, the following, namely, buying and selling merchandise, farm machinery, fertilizer, stock feeds, live stock,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurley v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Palmer v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Clark v. DillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Cowan v. Sargent Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Plankinton Packing Co. v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Echelon Homes, LLC v. Carter Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Flat Hots Co. v. Peschke Packing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Langel v. BoscagliaMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Mitchell v. Western Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Echelon Homes, LLC v. Carter Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API