Legal Opinion

Langel v. Boscaglia

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1951No. Docket 36, Calendar 44,975PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Jobn and Lillian Langel, plaintiffs, desirous of having a borne built on tbeir lot in Ma-comb county, consulted several Detroit builders who all refused to build tbe borne because of tbe distance from Detroit, and tbe lack of utilities at tbe building site. In the course of their inquiry plaintiffs were referred to Albert Boscaglia, defendant, a contractor listed in the telephone directory as Albert Boscaglia. & Sons and who lived not too far from plaintiffs’ lot. Plaintiffs called at Albert’s home in November of 1947, and were told that they could find Albert at a house he was constructing.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bertha v. Regal Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. David Stott Flour Mills v. Saginaw County Farm BureauMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Beasore v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Capital Dredge and Dock Corporation, an Ohio Corporation v. City of Detroit, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. Echelon Homes, LLC v. Carter Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. David v. SergesMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Echelon Homes, LLC v. Carter Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Trustees of Plasters Local 67 Pension Trust Fund v. Martin McMahon Plastering, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API