Legal Opinion

Cowan v. Sargent Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1905No. Docket No. 27PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Assumpsit by J. Fred Cowan against the Sargent Manufacturing Company for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

This is an action of assumpsit to recover for goods sold and delivered, to the amount of $190.05. It was commenced in justice’s court, in which court the plaintiff recovered a judgment for the full amount of the claim. The case was appealed to the circuit court, and tried before the judge without a jury. He rendered a judgment in favor of the defendant. The case is brought here by writ of error.

The circuit judge made findings of fact and conclusions of law which s.tate the questions involved in the case. They are as follows:

“1. The plaintiff is a New York manufacturer of bedroom furniture,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurley v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Rice v. Peninsular ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Stilwell-Bierce & Smith-Vaile Co. v. Niles Paper-Mill Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In Re CAPUZZI ESTATEMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Fowler v. McQuiggMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. David Stott Flour Mills v. Saginaw County Farm BureauMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Mitchell v. Western Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API