Legal Opinion

Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1958No. 16PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clakk

This appeal concerns the scope of a contract carrier permit granted appellant by the Interstate Commerce Commission under the “grandfather clause” of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935. The Commission interpreted “stock in trade of drug stores,” a commodity description in appellant’s permit, to authorize carriage of only those goods which at time of movement are, or are intended to become, part of the stock in trade of a drugstore. On the basis of that interpretation, an appropriate cease and desist order prohibiting carriage of unauthorized goods was entered. 63 M. C. C. 407. After a three-judge…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Callanan Road Improvement Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Noble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Dart Transit Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. Brada Miller Freight Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Central States Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API