Legal Opinion

Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines v. United States

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 20, 1963No. Civ. 63-215PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge.

Plaintiff is dissatisfied with, and challenges the validity of, the conclusion of the defendant Commission that certain of the commodities being transported by plaintiff are beyond the scope of its operating authority.

Plaintiff is authorized by its Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity, as a motor common carrier of property, to transport, so far as here relevant, the following:

“Forest products and lumber” “Building materials and Heavy machinery, in truckloads”
“Building materials and Heavy machinery, including steel girders, steel pipe, boilers, water works…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Brothers Bond & Mortgage Co. (Station WIBO)Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Eastern Central Motor Carriers Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
  2. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1973
  3. National Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
  4. Beeline Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1970
  5. Dart Transit Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API