Legal Opinion
Callanan Road Improvement Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 8, 1953No. 488PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Minton
In 1941, one Joseph R. Hutton applied to the Interstate Commerce Commission for a permit to operate as a contract carrier by water between points on Long Island Sound, New York Harbor, the Hudson River, the New York State Barge Canal System, the Niagara River, and contiguous ports. In the alternative, he prayed a certificate of convenience and necessity if he be found to be a common carrier. The application was a “grandfather” clause proceeding under § 309 of Part III, Water Carriers, of the Interstate Commerce Act, 54 Stat. 941, 49 U. S. C. (1946 ed.) § 909.
The Commission, after hearing and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gregg Cartage & Storage Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- St. Louis Malleable Casting Co. v. George C. Prendergast Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Admiral Towing Company, a Corporation and Walter B. Martinson v. Theo Woolen and Dorothy E. ConeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.