Legal Opinion
Beverly Gravel, Incorporated and East Riverdale Gravel Company v. Louis J. Didomenico and Humbert Didomenico, Also Known as Bert Didomenico
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 27, 1990No. 89-1939PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Senior Circuit Judge.
The controversy underlying this appeal was resolved when the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Louis J. DiDomenico and Humbert DiDomenico, defendants-appellants, on a RICO claim and dismissed the pendant claims. Encouraged by a decisive district court opinion, Louis and Humbert sought sanctions against Beverly Gravel, Inc., and East Riverdale Gravel Co., plaintiffs-appellees, under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court declined to impose sanctions and denied defendants’ subsequent motion to reconsider. Defendants…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Margaret Morgan and Burton Morgan v. Bank of Waukegan, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Harry Aleman and Leonard ForestaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Northern Trust Bank/O'hare, N.A. v. Inryco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Hartz v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Union National Bank of Marseilles v. Leigh (In Re Leigh)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Henry C. Tyson, Sr. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Temple v. WISAP USA in TexasDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.