Legal Opinion
Hartz v. Friedman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 4, 1990No. Nos. 90-1042, 90-1043PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Bettye Hartz and her husband, Carroll, employed defendant Friedman, an Illinois lawyer, to recover damages for injuries Bettye sustained in 1980 and for medical malpractice in diagnosis and treatment of an injury she suffered in 1976. In 1981 Friedman brought an action on those claims in an Indiana court. Friedman, however, had failed to present the malpractice complaint to a medical review panel as required by Indiana law. Ind. Code § 16-9.5-9-2. On that account, the malpractice claims were dismissed without prejudice in 1983.
In 1985 the Hartzes, on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Margaret Morgan and Burton Morgan v. Bank of Waukegan, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Midwest Grinding Co. v. SpitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Spraying Systems Company v. Delavan, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Richmond v. Nationwide Cassel L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.