Legal Opinion
Temple v. WISAP USA in Texas
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided December 10, 1993No. 8:CV90-00731PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*596MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
After I referred this difficult matter to her, (Filing 94), United States Magistrate Judge Kathleen A. Jaudzemis conducted a thorough hearing and wrote two thoughtful opinions, (Filings 123 and 133), regarding the distasteful subject of whether James Welsh (Welsh), attorney for Plaintiff, engaged in conduct violative of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, and, if so, what the appropriate sanctions should be.
Judge Jaudzemis concluded that Welsh had indeed violated Rule 11, and she imposed sanctions in the form of fully compensatory attorney fees and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lease v. FishelDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Cedars Corp. v. Sun Valley Development Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Walker v. WalkerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1994
- Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Franklin v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.