Little Rock Crate & Basket Co. v. Young
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
When a plaintiff brings suit upon a claim arising from a certain transaction, may the defendant successfully assert a setoff that arose from a different transaction and was barred by limitations when the plaintiff’s cause of action accrued? The trial judge construed the controlling statute to mean that such a setoff cannot be allowed in reduction of the plaintiff’s claim. We disagree. Our jurisdiction is under Rule 29 (1) (c).
In 1981 the appellee as plaintiff filed his complaint to recover $7,207.20 as the purchase price of logs he sold to the defendant-appellant in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coats v. MilnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Loomis v. LoomisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Huggins v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Missouri & North Arkansas Railway Co. v. BridwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Davis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- Killam v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- William Earl Jennings, Appellee/appellant v. Dumas Public School District, Appellant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Patel v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Turner v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
- Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.