Legal Opinion

Turner v. Eubanks

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 1988No. CA 88-22PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin Mayfield, Judge.

Appellants, Richard and Jane Turner, appeal a decision of the Van Burén Chancery Court holding them liable for an amount found due on the purchase price for land deeded to them by the appellees.

On July 16, 1979, the appellants purchased 229.78 acres from the appellees, James and Charlotte Eubanks, for $151,703.00. In December 1983, James Canady won an adverse possession action for 0.94 acres of this land. In July 1984 appellants paid appellees the balance due on their mortgage but withheld $1,703.00 as reimbursement for the fraction of an acre lost to Canady. The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Gosnell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Rhodes v. CisselSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  5. Stewart v. SimonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riddle v. UdoujCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Office of Child Support Enforcement v. CalbertCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Riddle v. UdoujCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API