Patel v. Patel

hAppellant Vijay Patel appeals the Garland County Circuit Court’s judgment awarding appellee Yogin Patel 1 $130,000 on an unpaid promissory note, post judgment interest, and attorney’s fees. On appeal, Vijay argues that the circuit court erred by (1) finding that the handwritten agreement represented a binding contract, (2) applying a five-year statute of limitations, (3) failing to give Vijay credit for loans paid to Yogin throughout the 1990s, and (4) granting attorney’s fees. We affirm the judgment.

Vijay is a . doctor who lives in Chicago. He also owns several hotels across the country. In…