Legal Opinion
State v. Hurst
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1996No. 43A03-9606-CR-221PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOFFMAN, Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff the State of Indiana appeals the trial court’s grant of appellee-de-fendant Stephen R. Hurst’s motion to dismiss. The facts relevant to the appeal are as follows.
On October 5,1994, Stephen R. Hurst was traveling northbound on County Road 300 West and, upon approaching the intersection of County Road 600 North, had a stop sign. John R. Willard was traveling westbound on County Road 600 North and, upon approaching the intersection of County Road 300 West, had no stop sign or yield sign. As Hurst approached the intersection of County Road 600 North, he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bryant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Derado v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HurstIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Newman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997