Legal Opinion

Newman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1997No. 49A04-9606-CR-248PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant Constance Newman appeals following her conviction for battery by body waste, a Class D felony 1 prostitution a Class D felony 2 ; and resisting law enforcement, a Class A misdemeanor 3 .

We affirm.

ISSUES

Newman presents two issues for our review, which we restate as follows:

1. Whether double jeopardy bars Newman’s convictions for battery by body waste and resisting law enforcement.

2. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support Newman’s conviction of battery by body waste.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts most…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wethington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Whited v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Delahanty v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gregory A. Rose v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Duren v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Belser v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API