Legal Opinion
State v. Hurst
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1997No. 43S03-9705-CR-295PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON CRIMINAL PETITION FOR TRANSFER
SELBY, Justice.
The State of Indiana is appealing the dismissal of its reckless homicide ease against defendant Stephen Hurst (“defendant”). Defendant moved to dismiss in the trial court on the grounds that the reckless homicide charge would violate his double jeopardy rights because he had previously been tried for a traffic violation arising from the same facts. The trial court granted the motion. On appeal by the State, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision. State v. Hurst, 674 N.E.2d 622 (Ind.Ct.App.1996). The State petitioned this Court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Vermillion v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Chattanooga v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Cook v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Pavey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- VanPelt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.