Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Gonzalez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
An attorney wishes to file a complaint in the Ventura Municipal Court. The clerk will not accept the complaint for filing unless the attorney first submits a completed “case information sheet” required by a local court rule.
We are called upon to answer a question, universal to the legal profession, “Can they do that?”
Here we offer our answer to this weighty inquiry — “Sure.”
The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford) appeals from the order denying its petition for writ of mandate to compel respondent, Sheila Gonzalez, as Clerk of the Ventura Municipal Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Silver v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carlson v. STATE DEPT. OF FISH AND GAMECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rojas v. CutsforthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Mito v. Temple Recycling Center Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Elgen Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Mac Arthur Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2024