Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Elgen Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Mac Arthur Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 16, 2024No. 4:23-cv-04924Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ELGEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Case No. 23-cv-04924-JST INC., 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 DISMISS v. 10 Re: ECF No. 11 MAC ARTHUR CO., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Defendants Mac Arthur Company and James Donnelly (together, “Defendants”) have 14 moved to dismiss Plaintiff Elgen Manufacturing Company’s (“Elgen”) claims for interference 15 with contract and interference with prospective economic advantage. ECF No. 11. The Court will 16 grant the motion. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 A. Factual Background1 19 Elgen is a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API