Carlson v. STATE DEPT. OF FISH AND GAME
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZEBROWSKI, J.
Plaintiff, represented by out-of-county counsel, desired to sue in Los Angeles County. Plaintiff’s counsel prepared a complaint and sent it by Federal Express to the Los Angeles Superior Court in Santa Monica. The complaint complied in all respects with state requirements, but plaintiff’s counsel failed to include a “Certificate of Assignment” required by local rule. Because the Certificate of Assignment was absent, the clerk of the court (clerk) did not file the complaint, but instead mailed it back to counsel. By the time counsel was able to return the complaint to the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Quillie B. Woodham v. The American Cystoscope Company of Pelham, N. Y., and the Xyz CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Raul Loya v. Desert Sands Unified School District, a Governmental Agency & Harold SchoenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Joseph Raymond Cintron v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lauren Casola v. Dexcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Herman v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Apollo v. GyaamiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- MAGINN v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Duran v. St. Luke's HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.