Scott v. Zartman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Suit to foreclose a mortgage.
The complaint contained a description of the land mortgaged, and of the mortgage and the notes secured by it. Copies of the mortgage and notes may have been filed with the complaint. We say this, because the copies filed cori’esponded with the descriptions of the notes and mortgage set forth in the complaint; but the complaint did not contain the allegation, “ a copy of each of which is filed herewith.” It did not aver the identity of those described in the complaint and those filed with it.
*329The defendants appeared,but refused to answer.
The cause was submitted to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Donellan v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Whitworth v. BallardIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Westfall v. StarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Indianapolis, Pittsburgh, & Cleveland Railroad v. PettyIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Purdue v. StevensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. OstranderIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Old v. MohlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Indianapolis & Vincennes Railroad v. McCafferyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Owen School Township v. HayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Pennsylvania Co. v. RusieIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.