Whitworth v. Ballard
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Henry Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
On the 29th day of September, 1873, Christopher C. M. Bock made his promissory note, payable sixty days after date, to McCorkle & Co., for two hundred and fifty-five dollars and twenty cents, for value received, without relief from valuation or appraisement laws, with ten per cent, interest from date until paid. The payees were a firm by the name of McCorkle & Co., composed of John L. McCorkle, William B. Whit-worth and Benjamin Benbow. It is alleged that the payees, on the 30th day of September, 1873, for value received, endorsed the note in writing, by the name and style of “ McCorkle &…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bosseker v. CramerIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Pea v. PeaIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Jenkins v. ParkhillIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Gulick v. ConnelyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Trout v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Clouse v. FielderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Thornton v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Merrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.