Legal Opinion

Indianapolis & Vincennes Railroad v. McCaffery

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7530PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— The only question presented on this record is whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint was not tested by demurrer in the court below, but its sufficiency is first questioned on this appeal. The complaint, omitting formal parts, is as follows: “That theretofore, on the 7th day of February, 1861, one Lawrence McCaffery was the owner in fee simple, and lawfully in possession, of the following real estate in Knox County, Indiana, to wit: The south-east half of lot number four hundred and ninety in the city of Vincennes.. The said McCaffery so…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Indianapolis, Pittsburg, & Cleveland Railroad v. Keely's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Alford v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Donellan v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. NoelIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Puett v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Charlestown School Township v. HayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Trammel v. ChipmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Major v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API