Legal Opinion

Glynn Plymouth, Inc. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 2, 1969No. 44619, 44620PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

The primary question as to whether the evidence with all reasonable deductions and inferences therefrom demanded a verdict for the defendants is common to both of them in certain respects and will be considered first, along with the question of the probative value of certain critical testimony. We will then deal with the question of whether Glynn Plymouth, the dealer, could be held liable under the evidence for failure to inspect, discover, and repair the alleged manufacturing defects.

1. As to Both Defendants. The critical issues here are whether there was sufficient evidence…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Bennett v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Myers v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Mrs. Lois B. Nevels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Carey v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API