Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Marriage of Paresi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 24, 2010No. 960160484 A134598 (Control), A140275PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Husband in this consolidated appeal challenges (1) a supplemental judgment entered on December 8, 2006, that modified the amount of spousal support awarded to wife from $1,500 per month to $4,000 per month; (2) an order entered on September 30, 2008, that denied his motion to modify or terminate spousal support; and (3) supplemental judgments, dated December 27, 2006, and November 6, 2008, that awarded wife attorney fees and costs in the 2006 and 2008 proceedings, respectively. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3) (2007), amended by Or Laws 2009, ch 231, § 2, we reach three conclusions: (1) that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re the Marriage of NimanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. In re the Marriage of EchanisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of AaroeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API