Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Harden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 11, 1984No. D7907-65497; CA A28891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Wife appeals an order modifying the dissolution decree to reduce the award of permanent spousal support from $600 to $150 per month. She assigns as error that the trial court (1) failed to consider whether the original spousal support provision was a property division which could not be modified; (2) erred in finding a substantial change of circumstances permitting a permanent modification of spousal support; and (3) erred in allowing a reduction of $450 per month. We reverse.

Husband and wife, each now age 65, were married for 42 years. They have no minor children. Husband is the sole…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hellweg v. HellwegCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Matter of Marriage of MoakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Schaffer v. SchafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. In re the Marriage of EslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Carrier v. CarrierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goff v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Marriage of PopeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. In re the Marriage of NiethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. In re the Marriage of EchanisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. In re the Marriage of NiethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API