Legal Opinion

Otero v. Pacheco

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1980No. 3955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERNANDEZ, Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants sued DefendantsAppellees alleging fraud and unjust enrichment due to plaintiffs’ payment of ad valorem taxes which were owed by defendants. They further alleged that the sewer line which serviced both of their homes had backed up on various occasions, causing damage to their home. Defendants answered and counterclaimed, alleging that they had an easement across plaintiffs’ property for the maintenance of the sewer line. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment for the plaintiffs on their claim for payment of taxes owed by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CastellawTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Sanchez v. Dale Bellamah Homes of New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Southern Union Gas Co. v. CantrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Frantz v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Jack v. HUNT ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herrera v. Roman Catholic ChurchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Brooks v. TannerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Germany v. MurdockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hurlocker v. MedinaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Kiler v. BeamCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API