Legal Opinion

Germany v. Murdock

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1983No. 14675PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICI, Justice.

Suit was initiated by plaintiffs-appellees (plaintiffs) in the District Court of Lincoln County to permanently enjoin defendants-appellants (defendants) from interfering with an easement across land owned by defendants. The case was tried without a jury and the court entered judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal. We affirm.

Defendants and plaintiffs both trace their titles to a common grantor, J.A. Hanley (Hanley). Defendants’ property is located in Tract 14. Plaintiffs own Tracts 15 and 16. The northeastern boundary of defendants’ lot is the Rio Ruidoso.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toltec International, Inc. v. Village of RuidosoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Vrabel v. Donahoe Creek Watershed AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Garrett Building Centers, Inc. v. HaleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Otero v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Perea v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hornsilver Circle, Ltd. v. TropeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Sanders v. LutzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hottinger v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. SGM PARTNERSHIP v. NelsonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. USA Cartage Leasing, LLC v. BaerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API