Legal Opinion

Pearce Young Angel Co. v. Don Becker Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1979No. 795DC225PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff supported its motion for summary judgment with two affidavits and three exhibits. At the hearing on the parties’ summary judgment motions plaintiff then offered the testimony of its salesman Carl Dawsey to prove that defendant had been notified by plaintiff of Seawell’s termination of guarantee and that defendant had agreed to continue to be bound. Without directly ruling on the admissibility of this testimony, the court gave summary judgment for defendant. He also refused counsel’s request to place Dawsey’s testimony in the record, saying that “plaintiff’s counsel had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. ChantosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. In the Matter of Will of EdgertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Chandler v. CLEVELAND SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'NCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. United States Steel Corp. v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hillman v. United States Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Amoco Oil Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Pearce Young Angel Co. v. Don Becker Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API