Legal Opinion

United States Steel Corp. v. Lassiter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 21, 1976No. 753SC729PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

First, defendant contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the reason that the pleadings raised a genuine issue as to a material fact, namely, whether defendant is indebted to plaintiff in any amount. We find no merit in the contention.

While the party moving for summary judgment has the burden of positively and clearly showing that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, Brawley v. Heymann, 16 N.C. App. 125, 191 S.E. 2d 366 (1972), cert. denied 282 N.C. 425, 192 S.E. 2d 835 (1972), when the movant carries that burden the opposing party may not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cashmar-King Supply Co. v. Dowd & KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Little v. . ShoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Richlands Supply Co. v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Brawley v. HeymannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Will of EdgertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Wells v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Pearce Young Angel Co. v. Don Becker Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Bank of Am., N.A. v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. Pearce Young Angel Co. v. Don Becker Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API