Legal Opinion

Brooker v. Brooker

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 1, 1954No. 11969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In 1952 Mrs. Brooker sued for a limited divorce, alleging cruelty. She prayed, inter alia, for a fair and reasonable allowance for her maintenance. The District Court found that she had not sustained her burden of proof, and denied the divorce. It did, however, award her “alimony,” though it made no findings on the subject.

No appeal was taken from that judgment. We now have before us an appeal from an order of the District Court denying the husband’s motion — made many months later — to discontinue alimony. The motion was not based on any allegation of changed circumstances, but solely on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tolman v. TolmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1893
  2. Gill v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Parrella v. ParrellaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Shaw v. ShawDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Theodore J. Harris, Maloney Concrete Company, Inc., a Corporation, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., a Corporation v. Theodore Britton, Deputy Commissioner, District of Columbia Compensation District, Bureau of Employees' Compensation, United States Department of Labor, Louis M. Briscoe, (Three Cases). Theodore J. Harris, Maloney Concrete Company, Inc., a Corporation, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., a Corporation v. Louis M. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API