Legal Opinion
Gill v. Gill
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 31, 1945No. Nos. 8706, 8707PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
In March, 1940, Mary Osborne Gill filed, in tlie District Court, her complaint for di*155vorce a mensa et thoro against Lee Andrew Gill. She asked, also, for alimony; or in the alternative, a judgment for separate maintenance. Following a trial, the Court entered judgment for separate maintenance in her favor, the pertinent portion of which reads as follows: “That the plaintiff, Mary Osborne Gill, has duly established a case justifying the award to her of separate maintenance from the defendant, Lee Andrew Gill, and said defendant, Lee Andrew Gill, is hereby directed to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Oklahoma v. TextasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Melvin v. MelvinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Shellman v. ShellmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Geracy, Inc. v. HooverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- David v. NemerofskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Miller v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- St. Lo Const. Co. v. KoenigsbergerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- DeSipio v. DeSipioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Antonelli v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.