Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Shaw

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1894No. 200PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Hearing on an appeal by the complainant from a decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, holding an equity term, dismissing a bill by a wife against her husband for separate maintenance and support. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

The parties to this suit are husband and wife. The husband deserted the wife, and she filed her bill against him to compel' the payment of alimony pendente lite and permanent, “until such time as he may be willing to resume his marital duties and obligations.” The allegations, of the bill show no case for divorce and none is prayed for. It was dismissed.

1. The principal question in the case, viz., Has the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia jurisdiction to grant alimony as permanent relief on a bill for that purpose alone, where there is no ground for divorce, has been answered in the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. PedersenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Scholla v. Scholla (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. Brooker v. BrookerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. Scholla v. Scholla (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API