Legal Opinion

Parrella v. Parrella

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 2, 1941No. 7724PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Associate Justice;

Appellant, as plaintiff in the District Court, sued for annulment of marriage between himself and appellee on the ground that she had a living spouse at the time of the marriage of which annulment was sought. Following the hearing of the cause, the District Court found that appellee Antonietta and one Thomas Scandone lived together as husband and wife prior to 1924; in December, 1931, she married appellant Antonio; the lapse of time and circumstances between 1924 and 1931 were such as to justify the belief that Thomas Scandone was dead; at the time of the marriage in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Rhoda J. Chase, and Charles W. Chase, Elinor R. Chase Jones, Georgia E. Chase Snell and Lawson W. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  3. Matthews v. BrittonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  4. McVicker v. McVickerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Jennings v. JenningsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API