Brundridge v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) revoked petitioner’s parole because he allegedly violated two conditions: He was found in possession of a hunting knife contrary to the condition that he was not to possess “weapons,” and he went to a middle school in violation of the condition that he was not to “frequent any place where minors are likely to congregate.” Petitioner argues that the hunting knife was not a “weapon” and that, by going only once to a place where minors were likely to congregate, he did not “frequent” that place. We agree with petitioner’s second argument.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GilkeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. WeemsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Karjalainen v. Curtis Johnston & Pennywise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Premier West Bank v. GSA WHOLESALE, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- People v. LoveallSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- People v. LoveallColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.