Legal Opinion

Brundridge v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 7, 2004No. A116831PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) revoked petitioner’s parole because he allegedly violated two conditions: He was found in possession of a hunting knife contrary to the condition that he was not to possess “weapons,” and he went to a middle school in violation of the condition that he was not to “frequent any place where minors are likely to congregate.” Petitioner argues that the hunting knife was not a “weapon” and that, by going only once to a place where minors were likely to congregate, he did not “frequent” that place. We agree with petitioner’s second argument.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. GilkeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. WeemsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Karjalainen v. Curtis Johnston & Pennywise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Premier West Bank v. GSA WHOLESALE, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. People v. LoveallSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  4. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. People v. LoveallColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API