Legal Opinion

Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1969No. Nos. 68-336 and 68-337PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.

It is apparently conceded that the appellants’ applications are for the establishment of rates for a new service and not for an increase in rates.

The appellants contend that where an application is not for an increase in rates a duty is imposed upon the commission to permit the filing of a schedule of the rates proposed in such application and to fix the time when such schedule is to take effect.

The appellee contends that it may refuse to permit the filing of such a schedule and, upon hearing, make a determination as to whether such proposed rates are just and reasonable before fixing a time…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ohio Domestic Violence Network v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API