Legal Opinion

Haag v. Dry Basement, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 5, 1987No. 59,608PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, J.:

Defendant appeals the district court’s award of $3,460.00 in damages to plaintiff in her action against defendant arising out of a contract to repair plaintiffs basement. After defendant furnished its initial work, plaintiff s basement continued to leak, despite defendant’s frequent efforts to repair it.

Plaintiff filed suit against defendant under the Limited Actions procedure, seeking damages in the amount of $5,000.00. She based her cause of action on the theories of fraud, breach of express and implied warranties, and violation of the Consumer Protection Act.

Defendant asserts the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Venable v. Import Volkswagen, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Sprung Ex Rel. Sprung v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Holley v. Coggin Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Jefferson v. NeroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Shew v. Coon Bay Loafers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  2. McAuliffe v. Western States Import Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Williamson v. AmraniSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Golden v. Den-Mat Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  5. Alexander v. Certified Master Builders Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API