Legal Opinion

Kinkade v. Markus

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1979No. 37-563, CA 9992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

This is a suit for rescission of a land sale contract. The posture of the parties is unique because after the vendors filed a complaint for specific performance, the purchasers filed a cross-complaint seeking rescission of the contract based upon fraud. Thereafter, the vendors dismissed their complaint for specific performance and the case was tried on the cross-complaint for rescission. The court granted rescission and money "damages” to the purchasers. The vendors appeal on the grounds that the court erred (1) in finding that they perpetrated fraud, and (2) in awarding both rescission and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federici Et Ux v. LehmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Farmer v. GrovesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Martin v. Eagle Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. ZELENY ET UX v. KarnoshOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Blank v. Far West Federal SavingsOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robison v. KatzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Head & Seemann, Inc. v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. Kuperman v. EirasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Robison v. KatzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API