Legal Opinion

Kuperman v. Eiras

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 28, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs Savely and Vera Kuperman sued defendants Charles Eiras and E. James Gaines on a guaranty contract. At a jury trial in Superior Court (Cumberland County, Brodrick, J.) defendants successfully raised the affirmative defense that they were induced to execute the guaranty contract by a material or fraudulent misrepresentation made by the Kupermans. The Kupermans appeal. Their primary argument is that the court erred in failing to instruct the jury that an essential element in defendants’ fraud defense is proof that they suffered damage from the Kuper-mans’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jourdain v. DineenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  2. Reeves v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Forbes v. Wells Beach Casino, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Twin Island Development Corp. v. WinchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. Earl v. Saks & Co.California Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reliance National Indemnity v. Knowles Industrial Services, Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Maine Family Federal Credit Union v. Sun Life Assurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Estate of WhitlockSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Darling v. Western Thrift & LoanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
  5. Glenwood Farms, Inc. v. O'ConnorDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API