Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Philadelphia

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 1940No. Gen. No. 40,548PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice John J. Sullivan

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal seeks to reverse the order of the trial court which sustained defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s statement of claim.

Plaintiff, Mabel M. Ferguson, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Peter Ferguson, deceased, brought this action against defendant, the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia, to recover disability benefits and premiums claimed to be due and owing under the terms of two policies of insurance issued by defendant to the decedent.

The statement of claim alleged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Courson v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Hill v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Perlman v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Steffan v. Bankers Life Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hamrick Ex Rel. Estate of Hamrick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Bishop v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Telefilm, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Aleksich v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API