Legal Opinion

Steffan v. Bankers Life Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 13, 1932No. Gen. No. 36,045PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of $150 entered upon trial by the court of an action by plaintiff to recover benefits under a total and permanent disability clause of a life insurance policy. The defense is that plaintiff was not totally and permanently disabled; that defendant would be obligated only if such condition existed when it received proof of such disability, and that when proof was made such disability did not exist; that in any event plaintiff would not be entitled to payment from the date of the accident.

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Brams v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Buckner v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Wick v. Western Union Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Grand Lodge Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen v. OrrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Ferguson v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  4. Lundquist v. Illinois Life & Accident InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  5. Margie Bridals, Inc. v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API