Legal Opinion

Building Concepts, Ltd. v. Pickering

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1988No. 16831PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Building Concepts brought a claim and delivery action to regain possession of a fabricated steel building it had manufactured and shipped to Brad and Joanne Pickering and Jerry and Dorothy Smith, partners doing business as Sunkiss Enterprises (hereinafter Pickering). After the parties settled the underlying controversy concerning payment for the building, the district court awarded costs and attorney fees to Building Concepts.

Pickering appeals, raising the issue whether Building Concepts is a prevailing party and whether attorney fees are awardable under former I.C. § 12-120…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Idah-Best, Inc. v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gearin v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Yeager v. DunnavanWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Chenery v. Agri-Lines Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Paullus v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Anderson Lumber Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Daisy Manufacturing Co. v. Paintball Sports, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. BECO Construction Co. v. J-U-B Engineers Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rice v. Hill City Stock Yards Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Sanders v. LankfordIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API