Legal Opinion

Hayssen Manufacturing Co. v. Mootz

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1935No. 8069PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

In an action by plaintiff against defendant for $1,166.95, balance due on certain notes, defendant, upon plea of set-off, obtained verdict and judgment against the plaintiff for $3,301.13. Plaintiff sought and obtained writ of error.

The notes, executed by the defendant to the plaintiff, represented, in large part, the unpaid portion of the purchase price of a bread-wrapping machine sold by the plaintiff, manufacturer of the same, to the defendant, a baker.

The machine was installed in the defendant’s bakery in February, 1981. By his plea of statutory recoupment (Code, 56-5-5),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swain v. . SchieffelinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Taylor v. Sturm Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hull v. GearyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co. v. PatchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Norman Lumber Co. v. Keystone Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shreve v. Casto Trailer Sales, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Jackson v. ParsleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API